Legal Opinion

United States v. McGugin

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 3, 1940No. 293PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOPKINS, District Judge.

The action is one by the United States for the benefit of Jackson Barnett, a full blood Creek Indian and an enrolled member of the Creek Tribe, to recover $137,500 paid to the defendant Harold C. McGugin for services as attorney for the wife of Barnett. This sum was paid McGugin by Mrs. Barnett from a much larger sum received by her in a division of money, all of which was wrongfully withdrawn from funds credited to Barnett with the Treasurer of the United States.

A review of the craft and machinations brought into play by otherwise disinterested parties in dividing up…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. Equitable Trust Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Mott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. Board of Com'rsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1934
  5. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schaghticoke Tribe of Indians v. Kent School Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API