United States v. McGugin
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
HOPKINS, District Judge.
The action is one by the United States for the benefit of Jackson Barnett, a full blood Creek Indian and an enrolled member of the Creek Tribe, to recover $137,500 paid to the defendant Harold C. McGugin for services as attorney for the wife of Barnett. This sum was paid McGugin by Mrs. Barnett from a much larger sum received by her in a division of money, all of which was wrongfully withdrawn from funds credited to Barnett with the Treasurer of the United States.
A review of the craft and machinations brought into play by otherwise disinterested parties in dividing up…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. Equitable Trust Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Mott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Board of Com'rsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1934
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schaghticoke Tribe of Indians v. Kent School Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976