United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Citizens' Nat. Bank
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
The plaintiff has filed a motion to amend its complaint to conform to the proof. The proposed amendment is in accordance with the theory upon which the cause was tried and conforms to the proofs made. Therefore the motion to amend will be granted.
The evidence established the material allegations of the complaint as amended, and the facts need not be stated in detail, but will be noticed in connection with a discussion of the legal propositions involved.
During the years 1917 and 1918, Benjamin C. Davisson was the treasurer of Chaves county, N. M., and the American…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Hibernia Ins. v. St. Louis & New Orleans Transp. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
- Grenell v. Detroit Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- National Surety Co. v. State Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cargo Partner AG v. Albatrans Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- National Gypsum Co. v. Continental Brands Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Araserv, Inc. v. Bay State Harness Horse Racing & Breeding Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. AthertonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Western Surety Co. v. LoyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.