Legal Opinion

Zastrow v. Houston Auto M. Imports Greenway, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2017No. 16-20258PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

A jury found that Defendant-Appellant, Houston Auto M. Imports, Ltd. d/b/a Mercedes-Benz of Houston Greenway (“Mercedes Greenway”), retaliated against Plaintiffs-Appellees Mark Zastrow and his company, Heights Autohaus (collectively “Zastrow”) in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the jury’s verdict; however, we VACATE and REMAND the award of attorneys’ fees and REVERSE the award of certain costs.

I. FACTUAL HISTORY

Mark Zastrow owns Heights Autohaus, a car repair business that specializes in German vehicles. Prior to the events underlying this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. BITX Transportation Services LLC v. Forward Transportation Services LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
  2. Callier v. Tip Top Capital IncDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2024
  3. Cloud v. The Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
  4. Crain v. E & M Operating L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
  5. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau v. Texcon Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2026

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API