Crain v. E & M Operating L L C
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION DOUGLAS CRAIN, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 18-CV-00548 VERSUS JUDGE ELIZABETH FOOTE E&M OPERATING, L.L.C., MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY ET AL. MEMORANDUM RULING Now before the Court is a Renewed Motion for Default Judgment filed by Douglas and Catherine Crain (“Plaintiffs”) against E&M Operating, L.L.C. (““E&M”) and Coleman Matthew Caldwell (“Caldwell”) (collectively, “Defendants”). [Record Document 20]. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- New York Life Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Sun Bank of Ocala v. Pelican Homestead and Savings Association, and Third Party v. American First Mortgage Funding Corp., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.