Legal Opinion

Crain v. E & M Operating L L C

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided December 11, 2019No. 5:18-cv-00548Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION DOUGLAS CRAIN, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 18-CV-00548 VERSUS JUDGE ELIZABETH FOOTE E&M OPERATING, L.L.C., MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY ET AL. MEMORANDUM RULING Now before the Court is a Renewed Motion for Default Judgment filed by Douglas and Catherine Crain (“Plaintiffs”) against E&M Operating, L.L.C. (““E&M”) and Coleman Matthew Caldwell (“Caldwell”) (collectively, “Defendants”). [Record Document 20]. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. New York Life Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Sun Bank of Ocala v. Pelican Homestead and Savings Association, and Third Party v. American First Mortgage Funding Corp., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API