Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. MacHia

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 21, 1990No. 87-404Published

1DissentDooley, J.

The Vermont Constitution guarantees a defendant the right to a twelve-person jury — no more, and no less. This right can be waived only by strict adherence to the constitutional waiver provision, with the same formality required for waiver of an entire jury. Because the defendant in this case did not personally waive his right to a twelve-person jury, the waiver was constitutionally defective and he should be entitled to a new trial. Therefore, I must dissent.

I will review first the standards applicable to a waiver of a trial by jury because these standards are intertwined with those…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Richard Lowell Stratton, Steven Parness, Leonard Parness, and Bernard FarbarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Jonathan Garrett and Christopher GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API