Legal Opinion
SFP Tisca v. Robin Hill Farm, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 12, 1998No. SC 15803PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
The sole issue in the plaintiffs appeal is whether the trial court correctly determined that the absence from trial of the plaintiffs employee for business reasons was procured by the plaintiff for purposes of the admissibility of the employee’s deposition pursuant to Practice Book § 248 (1) (d) (2), now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 13-31 (a) (4) (B).1 We hold that under the circumstances of this case the plaintiff did not procure the absence of its witness. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the trial court’s judgment holding that the deposition was improperly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elgar v. ElgarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Dorothea Richmond v. Sherwood BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Hyam v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Vesce v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jacobs v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. TetiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Killion v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Burse v. American International Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Hutchinson v. Town of AndoverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998