Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Kopetka v. Young

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 24, 1970No. 3-69 Civ. 231Published

1Opinion of the Court

NEVILLE, District Judge.

Before the court for consideration is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a state court prisoner who at the time of its filing was serving an indeterminate sentence for third degree murder. The court, mindful of Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed. 2d 837 (1962) and Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1962), ordered an evidentiary hearing. Shortly following the hearing petitioner was paroled and so is now at liberty. This .fact does not, however, render the petition moot since even when paroled the movement and actions…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. Handy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  5. Anthony Cardarella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API