Legal Opinion

Appleton v. Ecaubert

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

Decided March 12, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Bill to avoid interfering patents.

1Opinion of the Court

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit in equity, brought under section 4918, Rev. St. U. S., which provides “that whenever there are interfering patents * * * the court [in such suit] * * * may adjudge and declare either of the patents void in whole or in part,” etc. A special examiner to take testimony in the city of Washington, D. C., was duly appointed, and on the 27th and 28th days of January one William Burke, an examiner in the patent-office, was examined on behalf of the complainants, but not cross-examined; his further examination, together with that of other witnesses, being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blease v. GarlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Conn v. PennSupreme Court of the United States · 1820

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. LochrenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Hyatt v. DollCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  3. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Jeffrey Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  4. New England Phonograph Co. v. National Phonograph Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1906
  5. Hyatt v. DollCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API