Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Great Falls Tribune Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1989No. 89-67 and 89-94PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

In these consolidated cases, we conclude that under Montana law, the public and press have a right of access to attend judicial hearings conducted to determine whether probation rights of convicted persons should be revoked; but that in a proper case such as this, a district court may close such a judicial hearing to the public and press under state law without thereby offending the federal constitution. When such hearings are properly closed to the public and press, no member of the public or representative of the press may interrupt the due course of such a hearing in a manner which might…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Publicker Industries, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BurnsMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Great Falls Tribune Co., Inc. v. DayMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Flesh v. Board of Trustees of Joint School District 2, Mineral & Missoula CountiesMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. BoultonMontana Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API