Legal Opinion

Canal Authority v. Litzel

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 16, 1970No. 39469PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

243 So.2d 135 (1970)

The CANAL AUTHORITY of the State of Florida, a Body Corporate under the Laws of the State of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Harry M. LITZEL and Natalie W. Litzel, His Wife, Respondents.

No. 39469.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 16, 1970.

Rehearing Denied February 2, 1971.

Ralph E. Elliott, Jr., Frank C. Decker, of Decker, Eliott & Kaler, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

J. Robert McClure, Jr., of McClure, Wigginton, McClure & Culpepper, Tallahassee, Joe C. Miller, II, and Peter T. Miller, of Dowda, Miller, Hedstrom & Fields, Palatka, for respondents.

Myron G. Gibbons, of Gibbons, Tucker,…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilton v. County St. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co. v. County of BrevardSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  3. Canal Authority v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. Sibley v. Volusia CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Inland Waterway Develop. v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Jacksonville v. GriffinSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Ball v. City of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Dade County v. PaxsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Knappen v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Florida Power & Light Co. v. BermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API