Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Wright

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2002No. 71619-6PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

— At issue in this dissolution action is the method for calculating the present value of an employee-spouse’s vested but unmatured pension. The trial court exercised its discretion and based the present value on what it found to be the employee-spouse’s likely retirement age rather than on the earliest date at which the pension would mature. The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision. We likewise conclude that, under Washington law, a trial court’s calculation of the present value of a community owned pension need not be based on the employee-spouse’s earliest retirement date. Because we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wilder v. WilderWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. DeRevere v. DeRevereCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. In Re Marriage of SkadenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Matter of Marriage of HurdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Farmer v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In Re Marriage of WrightWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Smith v. HenleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  5. In Re The Marriage Of: Philippe Chainier, And Kellie Ann ChainierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API