City of Las Vegas v. O'DONNELL
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
David Furniss, real party in interest, was originally charged in a Las Vegas municipal court proceeding with one count of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of NRS 484.379. Prior to trial, Furniss moved to have evidence of an intoxilyzer breath analysis test suppressed on the ground that the state had failed to preserve samples of his breath at the time of the testing. The motion was denied, and Furniss was ultimately found guilty as charged.
Furniss then filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction to the Eighth Judicial District Court-pursuant…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Garcia v. Dist. Court, 21st Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Boggs v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
4Cited by5 opinions
- State v. YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HallNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Layton City v. WatsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. MolinaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1985
- Childs v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999