Commonwealth v. Knowles
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
Appellant Deramus Knowles and a codefendant, Thomas Meadows, were convicted of possession of narcotics 1 and each was sentenced to two to five years imprisonment. Pretrial both defendants separately filed seasonable motions to suppress; both motions were denied. *73Jointly tried nonjury, both men were found guilty. Separate appeals were taken to the Superior Court. In Meadows’ appeal the Superior Court held that certain evidence introduced over objection against both defendants should have been suppressed; Meadows was granted a new trial. Commonwealth v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.