Legal Opinion

(PC) Davis v. Mandrigal

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 29, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01296Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS, No. 2:24-cv-1296 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MANDRIGAL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

18 without a lawyer. He has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this 19 action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot 20 afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to 21…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API