Legal Opinion
The Hindanger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1935No. 7275PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORCROSS, District Judge.
Appellants, libelants in the court below, filed libels against the motorship Hindanger et al., respondents and appellees, to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned by delay and deviation of the said motor-ship Hindanger on a voyage from the ports of Seattle and San Francisco to Buenos Aires, Argentina, occasioning loss by reason of decline in the market value of 11,-000 and 4,000 cases of eggs, shipped by appellants from said Pacific Coast ports respectively, on said Hindanger for delivery at the port of Buenos Aires. The libels were consolidated for trial,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dietrich v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- The Frederick LuckenbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Toyo Kisen Kabushiki KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Nilsen, Rantoul & Co. v. Ocean Transp. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Florida Grain & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wellman v. Toyo Kisen Kabushiki KaishaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
- Squillante & Zimmerman Sales, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981