Legal Opinion
Nilsen, Rantoul & Co. v. Ocean Transp. Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 30, 1922PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.
The claimant issued bills of lading for merchandise destined for'Valencia, Spain, containing the following clause:
“3. It is mutually agreed that the carrier shall have liberty to forward the goods by, or transfer to, any other steamer, to transship, to sail with or without pilots, to tow and assist vessels in any situation, and also to deviate, to proceed to the port stated in. this bill of lading via any port or place en route or beyond, in any order, whether in or out of the customary or advertised route for any purposes whatever; to discharge and land by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The BlandonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- South Atlantic S. S. Line v. London-Savannah Naval Stores Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
- Butler v. KansasDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1898
3Cited by11 opinions
- Charles Pfizer & Co. v. Convoy S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- The Frederick LuckenbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- Smith v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- The YungayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Wellman v. Toyo Kisen Kabushiki KaishaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.