Legal Opinion

The Imogene M. Terry

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 2, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel in rem.

1Opinion of the CourtNixon, J.

In the above libel the libelant, with some self-complacency, describes himself as master of the sloop Imogene M. Terry. But courts of admiralty deal with things, and not with words. If the proofs show that ho is in fact an ordinary seaman, under the control of the master, his calling himself the captain ought not to hinder him from invoking the seaman’s remedy for the collection of his wages. It is well settled in the admiralty that the captain has no libel in rem upon the vessel for his wages. The Orleans v. Phœbus, 11 Pet. 175. Two reasons are ordinarily assigned for this : (1) Because the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Steamboat Orleans v. PhœbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. The Grand TurkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1817

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rupert CityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
  2. Chandler v. The Willamette ValleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1896
  3. Pond v. The Hattie ThomasDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1894
  4. Charles Nelson Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
  5. O'Connell v. One Thousand & Two Bales of Sisal HempDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API