Legal Opinion
Ruth WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRUMMAN OHIO CORP., Fka Grumman Flxible Corp., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1987No. 86-3065PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Per curiam
The district court dismissed Ruth Wilson’s Title VII complaint against Grumman because the complaint was filed more than ninety days after receipt of her “right-to-sue” letter from the EEOC. We affirm the district court.
Wilson received her “right-to-sue” letter from the EEOC on June 14, 1984. She filed her original claim in district court on September 10, 1984, eighty-seven days after receiving the notice. However, she failed to perfect service on Grumman for approximately eight months. The district court granted Grumman’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that Wilson’s failure to perfect…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Mark F. Elmore v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Horace Lee Dunlap v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Eunice Andrews, Patricia Chilton, Barbara Tommie v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Roderick Courtney Mann v. American AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ronald Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.