United States v. 35 MM Color Motion Picture Film Entitled "Language of Love"
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1383OPINION
POLLACK, District Judge.
The advisory1 jury reported that the film involved herein is an appeal to prurient interest, an offensive affront to contemporary community standards and utterly without redeeming social importance and value.2 Motions are now made for a directed verdict for the claimants, for a new trial and for a stay of the judgment.
To prevent harm to others, the purveyors of obscenity are by statute3 deprived of the opportunity of free expression thereof. The Constitution does not protect obscenity.4 A society may protect its citizens from public assault by motion pictures…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ginzburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. ThevisDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1971