Legal Opinion
Ankner v. Napolitano
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided January 8, 2001No. 00-148-AppealPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*713OPINION
FLANDERS, Justice.
This is the latest skirmish in the long-raging condemnation battle between Capital Properties, Inc. (CPI), the State of Rhode Island (state), and the City of Providence (city). Because our prior published opinions have chronicled the history of this protracted conflict,1 we will not recap it here, except as needed to address the issues presented by this appeal.
On December 20, 1999, we issued an order, a copy of which is appended hereto, that remanded this case to the Superior Court. The purpose of the remand was to enable CPI and the state to present their respective…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Capital Properties, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- DiLuglio v. Providence Auto Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Cardi Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
- Capital Properties, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- M. S. Alper & Son, Inc. v. Director of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradford Dyeing Ass'n v. J. STOG TEC GMBHSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Ankner v. NapolitanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Woodland Manor, III Assoc. L.P. v. Reisma, 89-2447 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003