Legal Opinion

Cude v. Couch

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

588 S.W.2d 554 (1979)

Betty Rose CUDE, Administratrix of the Estate of Jessie Robert Cude, Deceased, Petitioner,

v.

Nathan COUCH, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

October 22, 1979.

Lloyd S. Adams, Jr., Adams, Ryal & McLeary, Humboldt, for petitioner.

Dwight Hawks, Humboldt, for respondent.

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

This case presents the single question of whether, in purchasing certain assets of a partnership upon its liquidation, Nathan Couch breached the duty that he owed to his partner, J.R. Cude. We conclude, as did both courts below, that he did not.

The partnership in question was formed by…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Bagg v. OsbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Cude v. CouchTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API