Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1962No. Civ. 26644PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

By his petition for a writ of prohibition petitioner seeks to prevent his being tried a second time, after the jury was dismissed at his first trial ostensibly for inability to reach a verdict. His claim is double jeopardy.

Petitioner was tried by a jury on June 18, 1962, upon a charge of incest, violation of section 288, Penal Code, etc., before Samuel Laidig, Judge pro tempore of the superior court and was represented by the public defender. Both sides having rested the jury was instructed on June 19, 1962 and retired to deliberate at 11:45 a. m. They lunched from 12:10 p. m. until 1:25 p.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Paulson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Cardenas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. McNealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. FredericksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. People v. SturdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API