Legal Opinion

Saint v. Martel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 28, 1910No. 17,951Published

Appeal from Twenty-Third Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary; W. P. Martin, Judge ad hoc. Action by Percy Saint against J. Sully Martel. , Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion

On the Merits.

It is heyond dispute that defendant acquired from Arnaudet, Houssiere, and Latreille one-half of one-fifth interest in their lands in the Jennings Oil Field, and that, at his repeated and urgent solicitation, Brown | finally agreed to buy one-tenth of the interest so acquired, which defendant then seemed to think, and so represented, was one-fifth, instead of one-half of one-fifth. Thus J. Clifford Brown (son of Jas. B. Brown), examined under commission, gives the following testimony:

“I am very familiar with the sale. I was there frequently when this sale was being talked of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. State ex rel. Watkins v. North American Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Mirandona v. BurgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  4. Gauche v. Metropolitan Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  5. Barrett v. HardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API