Legal Opinion
Randolph v. Cantrell
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 18, 1985No. 61938PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANS, Judge.
Defendant Cantrell appeals from the trial court’s finding reinstating retirement benefits for Randolph. Having reviewed the record and applicable law, we find that the defendant has no standing to bring the appeal when the Board voted not to appeal the ruling. The appeal is dismissed. ’
Randolph was a deputy county sheriff for Tulsa County from 1955 until 1977. In *491976, Randolph was injured during his employment. After unsuccessful attempts to return to work, he retired in 1977. At that time he applied for and received disability status. The Trustees of the Board found that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Juanita M. Patti v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Sarkeys v. INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 40, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Trapp v. Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Glass v. Carmelite Sisters of St. Therese of the Infant JesusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Newman v. Richland County Historic Preservation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Cole v. Asarco Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Newman v. RICHLAND CTY. HIST. PRES. COM'NSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Randolph v. CantrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985