Legal Opinion
Meek v. Flynn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 22, 1946No. 32334PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C.J.
The parties to this appeal will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, wherein defendants in error, Sue A. Flynn and Kermit I. Flynn, were plaintiffs, and F. J. Meek, plaintiff in error, was defendant.
Defendant Meek was engaged in the real estate business in Oklahoma City under the name of Meek Realty Company, and listed with the company for sale was an improved lot in an addition to the city which was owned by one J. T. Weaver, a resident of California.
The plaintiffs, on August 3, 1944, executed a purchase contract wherein they agreed to purchase said lot at the price of $8,400,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gall v. BrashierCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Hall v. DealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Boles v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Perry v. Thorpe Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963