Legal Opinion

Brault v. Flynn

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 17, 1996No. 95-533PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Following a jury trial, plaintiff accepted a remitted verdict. The trial court permitted plaintiff to condition acceptance on the right to appeal the remittitur. On appeal, plaintiff maintains that the court abused its discretion in granting remittitur. As we conclude that plaintiff may not simultaneously accept remittitur and appeal the court’s decision to grant it, we do not review the remittitur decision on the merits. Instead, we reverse and remand the case for reconsideration, in light of this decision, of the motion for remittitur.

Plaintiff, who suffered permanent injuries when her car…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Burns v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  5. State v. ReadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. Antilles School, Inc. v. LembachSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  3. Irving v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. Mathieu Enterprises, Inc. v. Patsy's CompaniesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  5. Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API