Legal Opinion

Lucke v. Guest

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1955No. 1675Published

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Mr. and Mrs. Lucke sued for return of a deposit on the purchase price of a house, and for damages. They named as defendants the vendor of the property and also the real estate broker and his salesman. In a full and carefully prepared opinion the trial judge ruled in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

*690The principal claims of error are based on alleged misrepresentations in connection with the written contract of sale which had been signed by the purchasers, by the seller and by the broker. The contract contained the usual provision for forfeiture of the deposit in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hiltpold v. SternDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Harrington v. HeaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API