Legal Opinion

Carol Apperson, Sandra Bott, Danella Poling v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, Janet Styck v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 18, 1994No. 93-3947, 93-3950PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in these diversity cases brought products liability actions against E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) claiming they were injured by medical prostheses manufactured with DuPont materials. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of DuPont, and the plaintiffs’ suits were consolidated on appeal.

I

After experiencing problems with their temporomandibular joints (TMJ) (the joint connecting the upper and lower jaw), the plaintiffs received a medical prosthesis known as the Proplast TMJ Interpositional Implant. After implantation, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Akin v. Big Three IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re Temporomandibular Joint (Tmj) Implants Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Akin v. Ashland Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Felipe Ruiz v. Blentech CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Artiglio v. General Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API