Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Cunningham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1991No. 16933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Presiding Judge.

In this action, Ruth Cunningham (wife) seeks to recover her attorney’s fee and expenses incurred in enforcing a stipulation modifying a dissolution decree. She bases her right to recover upon a clause of that stipulation. The trial court, in a non-jury trial, awarded her $500.00. The wife appeals.

The parties entered into a separation agreement on December 7, 1971. They were divorced December 17, 1971, and apparently the terms of that agreement were incorporated in the decree of divorce. On April 7, 1977, Robert Cunningham (husband) filed a motion to modify that decree.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Campbell v. KelleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Begley v. Adaber Realty & Investment CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. Carondelet Savings & Loan Assn. v. BoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Braun v. LorenzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scheck Industrial Corporation v. Tarlton Corporation, Defendant/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Janet Hurst v. Kansas City, Missouri School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Heider v. HeiderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API