Pahy v. Pahy
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Irma Pahy, the present appellant, filed a petition for divorce against her husband, John, the present respondent, basing her right to a decree upon the ground that her husband had been guilty of adultery. The following facts are not disputed. The parties were married in 1912, and lived together in New Jersey until November, 1922. In that month the petitioner left her husband and went to Hungary, where she remained for some time, returning in July, 1924. After her return she lived with her husband for a few days, and he then left her, went to Chicago, took up his abode there, then moved to…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Batka, Francis J. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Brown v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Renner v. RennerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Reik v. ReikNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Hayward v. Passaic Natl. Bank Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.