Legal Opinion

Bountiful v. Swift

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1975No. 13777PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTOFFERSEN, District Judge:

This case was commenced by the plaintiff Bountiful City by the filing of a complaint pursuant to Sec. 78-34-6, U.C.A. 1953, to acquire property for the completion of a collector road designated by name as Davis Boulevard by right of eminent domain. The property sought by these condemnation proceedings includes a portion of the property owned by the defendants Shelley A. Swift and Janet Swift, his wife.

The complaint was initiated pursuant to a resolution adopted by the governing body of Bountiful on June 13, 1974. Concurrently the plaintiff filed a motion for an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Luker Sand & Geavel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Tooele City v. ElkingtonUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Olsen v. Park Daughters Investment CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Town of Perry v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Nuhn v. BroadbentUtah Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cornish Town v. KollerUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Utah County v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Valley Lane Corp. v. BowenUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Skokos v. CorradiniCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  5. Utah Department of Transportation v. FullerUtah Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API