Bountiful v. Swift
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTOFFERSEN, District Judge:
This case was commenced by the plaintiff Bountiful City by the filing of a complaint pursuant to Sec. 78-34-6, U.C.A. 1953, to acquire property for the completion of a collector road designated by name as Davis Boulevard by right of eminent domain. The property sought by these condemnation proceedings includes a portion of the property owned by the defendants Shelley A. Swift and Janet Swift, his wife.
The complaint was initiated pursuant to a resolution adopted by the governing body of Bountiful on June 13, 1974. Concurrently the plaintiff filed a motion for an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Luker Sand & Geavel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Tooele City v. ElkingtonUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Olsen v. Park Daughters Investment CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- Town of Perry v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Nuhn v. BroadbentUtah Supreme Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cornish Town v. KollerUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Utah County v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Valley Lane Corp. v. BowenUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Skokos v. CorradiniCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- Utah Department of Transportation v. FullerUtah Supreme Court · 1979