Legal Opinion

Mancino v. Friedman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1980No. 41331PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilbert, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Paul Mancino, Jr., brings this appeal from an order of Cleveland Municipal Court granting the motion of defendant-appellee, Harry Friedman, to vacate and set aside a confessed judgment which appellant had previously obtained from the court.

The record of this case reflects that, on June 4, 1979, appellant filed his complaint below, alleging, inter alia, that ap-pellee owed him $350 plus eight percent per annum interest from July 15,1977, on a promissory note and that appellee had signed a warrant of attorney authorizing any attorney at law to appear on his behalf in any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Adomeit v. BaltimoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Doddridge v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Ostrander v. Parker-Fallis Insulation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bates & Springer, Inc. v. StallworthOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Andres v. City of PerrysburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. General Motors Corp. v. Paramount Metal Products Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. WilloughbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API