Legal Opinion
Faye v. Feldman
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 1954No. Civ. 20158PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Plaintiff brought this action against defendants Gertrude Feldman and Sam Feldman for damages for alleged wrongful attachments levied in an action on a promissory note and against Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, the company which issued the undertakings on the attachments.
Three prior actions are involved. First: An action, numbered 572587, brought by defendant Gertrude Feldman against F. & F. Development Corporation, Bernard Faye— plaintiff in this action, and Sam Feldman—defendant in this action, on a promissory note in which an affirmative defense of nondelivery was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marshall v. Packard-Bell Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Paige v. O'NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- The Texas Co. v. WieczorekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Estate of HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Skrbina v. Fleming Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Los Angeles City School District v. Landier Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Weeshoff Construction Co. v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.