Legal Opinion

State v. Lazar

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2005No. ED 86266PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GLENN A. NORTON, Chief Judge.

Marc Lazar appeals the denial of his motion to correct nunc pro tunc the written suspended execution of sentence (“SES”), claiming that the trial court orally pronounced a suspended imposition of sentence (“SIS”). We affirm.

I. BACKROUND

Lazar pled guilty to statutory sodomy and statutory rape. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court told Lazar that the ten-year prison sentence recommended by the State was disproportional and would serve no purpose in this case:

Now, I’ve told the lawyers in this case that I don’t think under all of these circumstances that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yale v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. State v. CarrascoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. State v. HunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Popowich v. ConleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aminadab Johnson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State of Missouri v. Dale L. WolfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State of Missouri v. Vontez G. HowardMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API