Legal Opinion

Dolliff v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 20, 1958No. 61961; protests 267851-K and 267852-K (Boston)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The-merchandise the subject of the two suits listed above was classified by the collector of customs at Boston as “Filaments of Rayon, not over 32" in length,” and duty was levied thereon at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1302 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802. Plaintiff claims said merchandise to be properly dutiable at 5 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph 1302, as modified, supra, as waste of rayon or other synthetic textile, except waste wholly or in chief value of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. Alintex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Alintex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API