Legal Opinion
In Re Ruggles
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont
Decided May 30, 1997No. 15-10456PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CONFIRMING PLAN
FRANCIS G. CONRAD, Bankruptcy Judge.
The issue before us 1 today is whether Debtor’s proposed Chapter 13 plan meets the tests set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 1325. More specifically, we examine whether Debtor’s plan was proposed in good faith under § 1325(a)(3) and whether it meets the “best interest of the creditors” test as provided in 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(4). Although no objections to confirmation were interposed, we have a statutory duty to ensure that these fundamental conditions to confirmation have been met. We find that they have, and confirm the plan.
FACTS
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens, Bankrupt. Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens v. Georgia Railroad Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- In Re AldermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1993
- In Re GaleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re LarsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- In Re BrizidaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- In Re DelbruggeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2006
- In Re TrigonisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1998
- In Re McCollumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.