Legal Opinion

Borden v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1936No. 6 Div. 787PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This proceeding is in bastardy and is purely statutory, and, while the statute (Code 1923, § 3422) requires that the proceedings shall be brought in the name of the state, a bastardy proceeding is not a criminal case in the meaning of the statute (Code 1923, § 3528), which dispenses with the assignment of error in criminal cases taken from a lower court to the appellate court on appeal. The measure of proof and other proceedings are as in civil cases. It is permissible, while the case is pending, to allow the respective parties in such proceedings to consent to a settlement thereof.

In this…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bragg v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Upton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Griffin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Mizell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API