Upton v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
In the court below, without the aid of a jury, the trial judge adjudged the accused guilty of non-support. The prosecution is based on the alleged violation of Secs. 89 and 90, Title 34, Code 1940. The parental designation under the latter section was enlarged by the adoption of the former.
In the instant case we are only concerned with: "* * * the father of such child or children, though born out of lawful wedlock."
The authorities hold that this parental relationship may be fixed in either of two ways: (1) By proof that the paternity of the child has been judicially established. (2) By proof…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Law v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- People v. SwiggyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Coan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Haas Bros. v. CraftAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Turner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977