Legal Opinion

Fricke v. Isbrandtsen Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 20, 1957PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMIERI, District Judge.

Defendant steamship line has brought this motion for summary judgment to dismiss plaintiff’s claim for injuries caused her, she has alleged, by defendant’s negligence and the unseaworthiness of its vessel. The defense which defendant urges is the expiration of the contractual one year limitation clause for bringing suit. Plaintiff contends that, notwithstanding a contractual provision pointing to United States law as governing the contract, German law controls, and that it may not give effect to the one year bar.

Plaintiff is a German national, entirely unconversant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Elias Siegelman, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Eva Siegelman, Deceased v. Cunard White Star LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Jansson v. Swedish American LineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
  5. Andrea Paduano v. Yamashita Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha and Norton, Lilly & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. S. Leo Harmonay, Inc. v. Binks Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. McQuillan v. " ITALIA" SOCIETA PER AZIONE DI NAVIGAZIONEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  5. Southern International Sales Co. v. Potter & Brumfield Division of AMF Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API