Legal Opinion
Lumauig v. Philippine Airlines
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 2, 1985No. 84 Civ. 8429PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
WALKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action alleging that Philippine Airlines (“PAL”) sold him a $350 tour package to Hong Kong including airfare and three nights in a hotel and then failed to book the hotel accomodations. The complaint alleges that when the plaintiff arrived in Hong Kong he was properly met and driven to the Lee Gardens Hotel where he “was surprised to find out that no reservation was made under his name contrary to the agreement entered into between Godfrey B. Lumauig and defendant Philippine Airlines.” There is no allegation that the plaintiff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rich v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Gillespie v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Boyce v. . Greeley Square Hotel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stone v. Continental AirlinesCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- Shlivko v. Good Luck Travel, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2003