People v. Allard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*625The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in summarily denying his motion pursuant to CPL 30.30 to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was denied the statutory right to a speedy trial because the People failed to demonstrate, as a matter of law, their entitlement to exclude the period from July 27, 2007, through August 28, 2007. Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s claim that the summary denial was error is properly preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hampton, 21 NY3d 277, 284 n 2 [2013]; People v Prado, 4 NY3d 725 [2004]).
In felony…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. SantosNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. PradoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. BeasleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. GoodeNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. CantoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. HendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. RousawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. AllardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.