Dielsi v. Falk
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE:
1.) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND;
2.) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD, FOURTH, FIFTH, AND SIXTH CAUSES OF ACTION
COLLINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s motion to remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Causes of Action came on regularly for hearing before this Court on January 22,1996. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff’s First, Second, Third, and Fourth…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Melchior v. New Line Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Facenda v. N.F.L. Films, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States Ex Rel. Berge v. Board of Trustees of the University of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Idema v. Dreamworks, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Creations Unlimited, Inc. v. McCainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.