Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 15, 1992No. 1901915, 1910220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue in this case is whether the plaintiffs' third-party claims, filed pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-11(b), are barred by the two-year statute of limitations set forth in §6-2-38(g).1

Tommy Hubbard was employed by Atrax-Newcarb, Inc., in Tuscaloosa County, working on wet grinder machines used to polish the exterior of tungsten-cobalt tools. His last day of work, hence his last day of exposure was August 21, 1987. Shortly thereafter, on September 1, 1987, he was diagnosed with "interstitial lung disease" (hard metals disease) caused by his exposure to tungsten carbide. Hubbard filed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Johnson v. Asphalt Hot MixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Becton v. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Cline v. Ashland, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Dudley v. Mesa IndustriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Namislo v. Akzo Chemical Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API