Legal Opinion
Caola v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 4, 1975No. Civ. H-75-110PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
These actions by 159 plaintiffs, all enlisted men in the United States Navy, have been consolidated. The plaintiffs, seek habeas corpus relief or, in the alternative, money damages under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), for the alleged breach of military enlistment contracts entered into by each of them. The defendants are the United States, the Secretary of Defense, 1 the Secretary of the Navy, and Vice Admiral Watkins, U. S. Navy, the Chief of Navy Personnel.
Each of the plaintiffs, between 1970 and 1973, enlisted for a period of four…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nicholas J. Larionoff, Jr. v. The United States of America, Nicholas J. Larionoff, Jr. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Pineman v. OechslinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Colonel Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Jimmy Carter, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Thakkar v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- McCracken v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.