Samsun Corp. v. Bennett
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
In this appeal, we are called upon to address the issue of whether an expert witness with general knowledge may be qualified to testify as to subject matter involving special knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education. In prior decisions of the Court of Appeals and this Court, the necessity for expert testimony to prove causation has been thoroughly discussed. As will be discussed more fully, infra, the necessity to produce an expert to establish the requisite standard of *62care when deficient medical care is alleged has been addressed. To a lesser extent, prior…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- State Department of Health v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Radman v. HaroldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Kujawa v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Fitzmaurice v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roy v. DackmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. v. BP Solar International, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Schneider v. LittleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Wantz v. AfzalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.