Legal Opinion
United States v. Vertz
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2002No. 00-2237PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NUGENT, District Judge.
Appellant, David Michael Vertz, Jr., appeals from the district court’s denial of his Motion in Limine to Dismiss and from the sentencing order. Vertz claims that (1) the district court erred in denying his Motion in Limine to Dismiss the Indictment because as a matter of law he has never been committed to a mental health institution and, in the alternative (2) the district court erred by not adjusting his sentencing guideline score to a level 6 pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(2) because the firearms which were the subject of the charge were solely possessed for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Natural Gas Utility DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Benjamin Y. Owusu (98-3356), Larry Latham (98-3847), and Anthony Latham (98-3850)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Alfredo PerezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. HoltCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. McLinnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. B.H.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
- United States v. McMichaelDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.