Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Mead

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1918No. 9377PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action, for damages; from city court of Blacksbear—Judge Mitchell. October 20, 19.17.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.

1. This case was tried in the city court of Blaekshear. The plaintiff had demanded in writing a trial by twelve jurors. Upon the call of the case for trial the judge caused a list of twenty-four jurors to be made up from the jurors who had been drawn and summoned to try cases at that term of court; and in this list were the names of five .jurors, three of whom were related within the prohibited degree to one Ray Riggins, who was an employee of the defendant at the time the cause of action sued on arose, and who, it was averred by the plaintiff, used to her the alleged offensive and insulting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fulton County v. AmorousSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Hill v. Chattanooga Railway & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Mayor of Cartersville v. LyonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Derryberry v. HigdonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Wilson v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Parker v. ClickenerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API