Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 29, 1942No. 29655PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

1. Ground 1 complains of error because the court, during the charge covering the law as applied to impeachment of witnesses, used the phrase “in a word.” The court fully charged the law applicable to the case regarding the method of impeaching witnesses. He then used the phrase quoted, in the following connection: “In a word, it is the exclusive province of the jury under all the attendant circumstances and conditions to determine whether a witness has been successfully impeached by any of the legal methods.” The words were merely an introductory or arresting phrase in the sense in which they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Downing v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Wright v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Sikes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Cambron v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neidlinger v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Cutts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Pryor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API