Jones v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
1. Ground 1 complains of error because the court, during the charge covering the law as applied to impeachment of witnesses, used the phrase “in a word.” The court fully charged the law applicable to the case regarding the method of impeaching witnesses. He then used the phrase quoted, in the following connection: “In a word, it is the exclusive province of the jury under all the attendant circumstances and conditions to determine whether a witness has been successfully impeached by any of the legal methods.” The words were merely an introductory or arresting phrase in the sense in which they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Downing v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Wright v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Sikes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Cambron v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neidlinger v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Cutts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Pryor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966