Legal Opinion
Gunning v. Muller
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1922No. 16805PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered July 11,1921, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover a broker’s commission.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
— Respondent sued for a broker’s commission and recovered judgment. There was a contract between the parties, as follows:
“April 23, 1919.
“To Henry J. Gunning:
“In consideration of the services to be performed by you in endeavoring to effect a sale of the following described property, viz.: 711 acres adjoining the town of Harrington on the south, N% Sec. 27 NE% Sec. 28 — SE%—Sec. 22 — S% of NE% Sec. 22, all in T 23 N Range 36 E.
“I do hereby give and grant unto you for the period of 60 days from date hereof and hereafter until withdrawal by ten days’ written notice the exclusive right to sell…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Axe v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Braniff v. BaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Lapham v. FlintSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Metcalf v. KentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Brownell v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Bell v. DimmerlingOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Ladd v. TeichmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Patton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.