Forcheimer v. Holly
Supreme Court of Florida
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit in Santa Rosa county. A statement of the case is contained in the. opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWestcott, J.
This was an action by the payee against the maker of the following promissory note:
$500. Mobile, March 23d, 1864.
One day after date I promise to pay to A. Eoreheimer, or order, five hundred dollars, value received. Negotiable and payable at the Mobile Savings’ Bank-.
E. F. Holly.
To the complaint describing this note as the cause of action, tlie defendant, Holly, filed two distinct answers — -one consisting of five grounds of defence — the other of two. The plaintiff, Eoreheimer, demurred to each of the answers and to the several matters of defence therein set up. This demurrer the court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thorington v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Carpenter v. SnellingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Spann v. BaltzellSupreme Court of Florida · 1847
- Latham v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Fife v. TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1867
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kreiss Potassium Phosphate Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Sisco v. RotenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Small v. SlocumbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1876
- Gray v. MossSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.